Skip to content

Protection

Categories

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

18 results found

  1. The outgoings section should be a universal budget planner that can advise on the mortgage and protection. On another system there is the ability if it is a joint application you can remove one applicant to see if the mortgage is affordable if one person was no longer able to pay. If the answer was red/no this then would feed into an Income Protection conversation.

    This feature idea is from a system called Midus but you have to be part of an exclusive network to get access to it.

    80 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi all,

    We recently launched the Financial Overview feature based on the Protection Adviser's need to see a high level view of the client's financial situation. We are evolving this feature to include more mortgage-related changes including the ability to add a Mortgage Budget, and improvements to our Income and Outgoings section.

    Please speak to your CS rep or keep an eye out for more information.

    Thanks,

    The Product Team

  2. Potentially create an area on Smartr whereby we can filter through the historical referrals made to the relevant protection adviser. Can then also use the notes section on this to update on any progress, so both the advisor and protection advisor can track this a lot closer.

    29 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Existing protection FF separates applicant 2 on their own, rather than in the joint application (without any information to where its saved)

    When we key in existing protection policies, you can only see the policies for the person who’s name you selected to enter a fact find. But we need to be able to see all existing policies for both parties of a fact find. Otherwise its’ not practical to be flicking back and forth to different ‘case names’.

    To try and summarise this, if I have Mr and Mrs Jones and I go into the fact find via Mr…

    19 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi all,  

    We are currently making changes to the Protection experience in Smartr. This requirement has been approved and planned for later this year.  

    Keep an eye out for more comms to follow.  

    Thanks,  

    The Product team

  4. 13 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Where a Protection Policy status is updated to Completed user to be prompted to create an equivalent policy in Existing Cover. The prompt should enable the user to save the status and choose whether to select to update Existing Cover or not. If Yes is selected Existing Cover should be auto updated to create a policy with all details populated i.e. do you wish this policy to be created as a policy within Existing Cover.
    This will avoid rekeying of data
    Where the Policy status is amended from Completed/Inforce a prompt should be given to the user to delete the…

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Can we have a Medical Questionaire that can be sent to the client at an appropriate stage of the Protection Conversation? This will allow us to speak to providers in advance about any medical conditions, getting an idea of potential loadings / declines.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. There needs to be an option to record a Life Insurance commission when it's paid over the 48 month earning period (non-indemnity).

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Having a pipeline reports for protection.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Currently the population in sourcing when trying to make IP recommendations is that of the income captured in Gross Annual Salary and not Gross Total Per Annum.
    This then means that you cannot recommend protection to the maximum amount that a customer needs to be able to protect as additional income such as bonus and overtime or allowances are not included.
    Please can this be amended so that the income captured in Gross Total per Annum is that which pulls through to solution builder

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Group protection (Group life, group income protection, group critical illness) to be added to SMARTER.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. Gives the advisor the opportunity alike re-mortgage tool to build back booking and building client retention.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. "Completed" status should be renamed to "In-Force" which reflects more closely industry terminology.
    Completed is terminology that relates to mortgages

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. Having the Status of the protection policy in the written report.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. Add new employment status of House Person to enable integration to SolutionBuilder

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. we wondered if it would be possible to incorporate the vulnerability section into the protection Fact Find?

    We believe it would be beneficial to have an option to mark ‘yes’ or ‘no’ regarding client’s vulnerability during the protection process and include any relevant comments. Having this feature in the Fact Find that would allow us to generate a report, similar to how we do for the mortgage side would be really useful.

    Do you think this is something that could be implemented?

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. Make Non F2F mandatory text box for Protection, just like it is for mortgages.
    I presume an assumption has been made that the adviser is both mortgage and protection licenses but in our business they are not. Therefore the protection advisers are also required to confirm how/when non-face to face meetings have taken place too which means a textbox should be mandatory on all LIVE/pipeline/in-flight protection cases too (not on those that have already completed).

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. Access to solution builder for an Admnistrator to allow them to quote for a specific adviser at the fim and then submit the application. Facility required that when Soltionbuilder selected it ask which adviser you want to quote for and then pre populates Solutionbuilder as it would if the adviser were doing the quotes.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. When using the income to push through to SB, it only takes the annual gross salary, rather than any commission as well. This is bad as if I have a applicant who has a base of 40,000, but a commission of 15,000, this 15000 is not being included, which in turn is highly impacting the results with less.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?